<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MethoMergent Lab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Blog for Generative Conversation and action within the UMC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Radical Inhospitality by Eric Folkerth</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/radical-inhospitality/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Folkerth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Wow. Quite surprising. 

In full disclosure, I&#039;ve known several staff members there over the years, and many good members. My strong hunch is that this was one person....however....

One person can really ruin it, can&#039;t they? And it reminds us that all of us are ambassadors for our churches in all we do on the campus. 

I can tell you that if the walk ever comes by our place, a few miles north on Preston from there, we&#039;d be more than pleased to serve water and hoot and holler with them. I&#039;m sure we&#039;d let &#039;em  use the bathroom, or be any other help we can.

Our general view is that almost anytime we can invite the community in it&#039;s a good thing. What a terrible memory some folks will now have of that place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Quite surprising. </p>
<p>In full disclosure, I&#8217;ve known several staff members there over the years, and many good members. My strong hunch is that this was one person&#8230;.however&#8230;.</p>
<p>One person can really ruin it, can&#8217;t they? And it reminds us that all of us are ambassadors for our churches in all we do on the campus. </p>
<p>I can tell you that if the walk ever comes by our place, a few miles north on Preston from there, we&#8217;d be more than pleased to serve water and hoot and holler with them. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;d let &#8216;em  use the bathroom, or be any other help we can.</p>
<p>Our general view is that almost anytime we can invite the community in it&#8217;s a good thing. What a terrible memory some folks will now have of that place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by thevinyard</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>thevinyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Sb, there was someone at the door, I did not finish that last post...

with reference to my comments on it...

as you said - &#039;the way the discipline recognizes my ability to be a recovered drug addict/alcoholic it still wants to claim that you are incompatible with Christian teaching&#039;

Regarding &#039;do our theologies run the same- i was refering to the methodists doctrine...not me and you... although we are inherently linked in this. 


I was speaking into - that when metioning sexuality on my last post - that it is very different here in England regarding those issues over ordination. 

I think if the church&#039;s agree on the main points in our doctrines we can learn from each other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sb, there was someone at the door, I did not finish that last post&#8230;</p>
<p>with reference to my comments on it&#8230;</p>
<p>as you said &#8211; &#8216;the way the discipline recognizes my ability to be a recovered drug addict/alcoholic it still wants to claim that you are incompatible with Christian teaching&#8217;</p>
<p>Regarding &#8216;do our theologies run the same- i was refering to the methodists doctrine&#8230;not me and you&#8230; although we are inherently linked in this. </p>
<p>I was speaking into &#8211; that when metioning sexuality on my last post &#8211; that it is very different here in England regarding those issues over ordination. </p>
<p>I think if the church&#8217;s agree on the main points in our doctrines we can learn from each other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by thevinyard</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>thevinyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 10:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-59</guid>
		<description>S b 

Yes, I hear what your saying... 

It is different here in England,  in the Methodist Church. I train alongside other ordination students who are openly Gay or lesbian. 

I know ordained Ministers in circuit who are Gay and Lesbian, or have disabilities...

Yet, do our theologies and practice run the same? 
On a different level, a comment was made to a pre -ordination student some 40 odd years ago that preaching in the &#039;market square&#039; was no longer fitting for a Methodist student and was not the sort of behaviour that Methodist were to encourage . I wonder how far we here have come from Weley&#039;s ways...?

However, I was on a park the other night leading a Bible study with three guys who were on drugs/homeless/ stealing to get their food... 

The Gospel of christ knows no religion but social... 

someone knocking on my door- get back to me- we have loads to talk about

God be in all we are and do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S b </p>
<p>Yes, I hear what your saying&#8230; </p>
<p>It is different here in England,  in the Methodist Church. I train alongside other ordination students who are openly Gay or lesbian. </p>
<p>I know ordained Ministers in circuit who are Gay and Lesbian, or have disabilities&#8230;</p>
<p>Yet, do our theologies and practice run the same?<br />
On a different level, a comment was made to a pre -ordination student some 40 odd years ago that preaching in the &#8216;market square&#8217; was no longer fitting for a Methodist student and was not the sort of behaviour that Methodist were to encourage . I wonder how far we here have come from Weley&#8217;s ways&#8230;?</p>
<p>However, I was on a park the other night leading a Bible study with three guys who were on drugs/homeless/ stealing to get their food&#8230; </p>
<p>The Gospel of christ knows no religion but social&#8230; </p>
<p>someone knocking on my door- get back to me- we have loads to talk about</p>
<p>God be in all we are and do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by s b gaddie</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>s b gaddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 03:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-58</guid>
		<description>My point is although we may read about the actions of Jesus few of us understand the how for removed from the main stream Jewish teaching he was.  My question to ponder was and is would someone as radical and be ordained in the UMC today.  I affirm your personal experience and I readily admit that the UMC can be better than some others in reception of candidates for ordination,. BUT the process is not without major problems and I still believe there must be some alternative.  I did not say that we should not continue to minister to those around us.  I do believe that if we do not continue to push the boundries on this idae of what and how we do ordination than we will have this issue fade away whle doing nothing and we would have missed a golden opportunity fotr growth and change.  By the way while the discipline recognizes your ability to be a recovered drug addict/alcoholic it still wants to claim I am incompatible with Christian teaching.  Show me where you can find Christ waying anything is wrong or incompatible with his teaching outside of those who would condemn others without looking at their own sins first.  
Finally, I still wonder if anyone were to be as radically differnet and opposed to the status quo could nasavigate the ordination system we have in the UMC.  I didn&#039;t say anything about character, I am talking about anyone with the audacity to be willingly to tell the powers that be they are wrong, that the UMC has strayed so tar from Wesley&#039;s views on social justice, and that says it is time for humans t let God call ministers to the priesthood regardless of age, gender, race, ethnic background, sexual orientation or physical disability would not be selected for ordination as an elder in the UMC.  I believe  that given the radical nature of Jesus message might have posed problems for even him getting through our process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is although we may read about the actions of Jesus few of us understand the how for removed from the main stream Jewish teaching he was.  My question to ponder was and is would someone as radical and be ordained in the UMC today.  I affirm your personal experience and I readily admit that the UMC can be better than some others in reception of candidates for ordination,. BUT the process is not without major problems and I still believe there must be some alternative.  I did not say that we should not continue to minister to those around us.  I do believe that if we do not continue to push the boundries on this idae of what and how we do ordination than we will have this issue fade away whle doing nothing and we would have missed a golden opportunity fotr growth and change.  By the way while the discipline recognizes your ability to be a recovered drug addict/alcoholic it still wants to claim I am incompatible with Christian teaching.  Show me where you can find Christ waying anything is wrong or incompatible with his teaching outside of those who would condemn others without looking at their own sins first.<br />
Finally, I still wonder if anyone were to be as radically differnet and opposed to the status quo could nasavigate the ordination system we have in the UMC.  I didn&#8217;t say anything about character, I am talking about anyone with the audacity to be willingly to tell the powers that be they are wrong, that the UMC has strayed so tar from Wesley&#8217;s views on social justice, and that says it is time for humans t let God call ministers to the priesthood regardless of age, gender, race, ethnic background, sexual orientation or physical disability would not be selected for ordination as an elder in the UMC.  I believe  that given the radical nature of Jesus message might have posed problems for even him getting through our process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laity and Ministry by Kurt</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/laity-and-ministry/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how this could be threatening to clergy at all,  Im la student local pastor and I&#039;d love to be able to tell all my baptized/confirmed adult members that they are ordained into an order of laity in the ministry of service.  

Of course, the problem with this is that words only have the power you allot to them.  Membership in the local church is no different than this proposed order (other than their names), thus an order of laity can be dismissed just as easily as local church membership.

The only way any of this&#039;ll work is if the order of Elders take seriously their call to equip the laity--be it an order or membership--to do the work of the church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how this could be threatening to clergy at all,  Im la student local pastor and I&#8217;d love to be able to tell all my baptized/confirmed adult members that they are ordained into an order of laity in the ministry of service.  </p>
<p>Of course, the problem with this is that words only have the power you allot to them.  Membership in the local church is no different than this proposed order (other than their names), thus an order of laity can be dismissed just as easily as local church membership.</p>
<p>The only way any of this&#8217;ll work is if the order of Elders take seriously their call to equip the laity&#8211;be it an order or membership&#8211;to do the work of the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by thevinyard</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>thevinyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone who is a clean drug addict, who is a dry alcoholic, who had a conversion in mud in a field...who was homeless and through this was led to a Methodist chapel where I was baptised and within three weeks local preaching... speaking as someone who led my first Easter day service having never been to an Easter day service before in my life... I am all for &#039;outside the box ministry&#039;

I am now pre-ord training and have never hid the fact from any assessment panel that I sooner go and sit with the drunks on the park bench then any academic....

I follow what your saying- but in a virtual world who is accountable to who. You talk of the incarnation of Jesus and of those he chose to be with... does this not point to an incarnational ministry- where- face to face- and hand to hand and test to test and prayer to prayer we are accountable together to test and challenge and affirm each others calling- whether as the preisthood of all belivers or to test someones call to be set apart to word and sacraments. Okay- online is public- but surley we need the tests- we need the challeges-of face to face encounters...to buld each other up...

To mention Jesus as not being able to get through the ordination process!! as being one who Cavorted? Jesus acted in a way that the Church as the Body of Christ is meant to act!!
Any one can see through His actions- Jesus would fit quite adequetly and publically, that Jesus did have a calling, I am sure He would be accepted... All He did was with Love and integrity. This is the Church&#039;s calling. 

Who sits on your panels of assessments?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone who is a clean drug addict, who is a dry alcoholic, who had a conversion in mud in a field&#8230;who was homeless and through this was led to a Methodist chapel where I was baptised and within three weeks local preaching&#8230; speaking as someone who led my first Easter day service having never been to an Easter day service before in my life&#8230; I am all for &#8216;outside the box ministry&#8217;</p>
<p>I am now pre-ord training and have never hid the fact from any assessment panel that I sooner go and sit with the drunks on the park bench then any academic&#8230;.</p>
<p>I follow what your saying- but in a virtual world who is accountable to who. You talk of the incarnation of Jesus and of those he chose to be with&#8230; does this not point to an incarnational ministry- where- face to face- and hand to hand and test to test and prayer to prayer we are accountable together to test and challenge and affirm each others calling- whether as the preisthood of all belivers or to test someones call to be set apart to word and sacraments. Okay- online is public- but surley we need the tests- we need the challeges-of face to face encounters&#8230;to buld each other up&#8230;</p>
<p>To mention Jesus as not being able to get through the ordination process!! as being one who Cavorted? Jesus acted in a way that the Church as the Body of Christ is meant to act!!<br />
Any one can see through His actions- Jesus would fit quite adequetly and publically, that Jesus did have a calling, I am sure He would be accepted&#8230; All He did was with Love and integrity. This is the Church&#8217;s calling. </p>
<p>Who sits on your panels of assessments?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laity and Ministry by conniejoh2o</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/laity-and-ministry/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>conniejoh2o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I think that this is a wonderful idea! Tony was getting jumped on for saying all should be ordained but THIS (I suspect) is what he was talking about!!! Not all are ordained to the same KIND of minstry but all are &quot;set apart&quot; for their own mission for the church.  I think the concept may be threatening to some professional clergy but TOO BAD it sounds like accountability and expectations for members and that sounds more Wesleyan then the way we are doing it now! GREAT idea!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is a wonderful idea! Tony was getting jumped on for saying all should be ordained but THIS (I suspect) is what he was talking about!!! Not all are ordained to the same KIND of minstry but all are &#8220;set apart&#8221; for their own mission for the church.  I think the concept may be threatening to some professional clergy but TOO BAD it sounds like accountability and expectations for members and that sounds more Wesleyan then the way we are doing it now! GREAT idea!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by s b gaddie</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>s b gaddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I think if we are standing on the precipice of a new age in how we look at organized religion AND if we will seriously consider what Church might look and feel like when done on a online and global stage THAN oerhaps it behooves those of us who see the radical nature of John Wesley to consider becoming radical Christians ourselves.  In that light let&#039;s consider alternative means and definitions of ordination.  Who is to say just because a thing seems to have always been means it should always be.   Picture for a moment an ordination process that recognizes the need for a priestly role to exist but sees that in the process of accountability the people who are being ministered too, the people who have known and been educated with, and the  person who is seeking ordination ALL should have a role.  I still think that as out of the box as a petition for ordination appears at first there is at least a kernel of possibility for something that has a place in the process present.  

WE cannot continue to do what we have always done and expect to have any different results. Seriously, lets take a step back, look outside the box and be willing to become radicals for Christ.  Look at who we all profess to be our Risen Savior.  A  poor carpenter from the backwater of Galilee, a Nazarene,  What good ever came out of Nazareth anyway.  A man who broke the Laws of Moses, who ate and cavorted with the unclean.  He spoke to women and treated them as equals, he choose his closest followers from the lowest  ranks of society. He kept company with most undesirables and had the audacity to challenge the status quo.  

How many of us think Jesus would have made it through the ordination process as it is now defined?  Who would want to be the one to tell Him he is not qualified?  Come to think of it would any of us stood and told the powers that be they had made a mistake?  Would any of us have signed a petition for ordination for the man just described?  Would we have felt compelled to lay our hands on Him and recognize Him?  Would we do it today if we had the opportunity?  Would we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we are standing on the precipice of a new age in how we look at organized religion AND if we will seriously consider what Church might look and feel like when done on a online and global stage THAN oerhaps it behooves those of us who see the radical nature of John Wesley to consider becoming radical Christians ourselves.  In that light let&#8217;s consider alternative means and definitions of ordination.  Who is to say just because a thing seems to have always been means it should always be.   Picture for a moment an ordination process that recognizes the need for a priestly role to exist but sees that in the process of accountability the people who are being ministered too, the people who have known and been educated with, and the  person who is seeking ordination ALL should have a role.  I still think that as out of the box as a petition for ordination appears at first there is at least a kernel of possibility for something that has a place in the process present.  </p>
<p>WE cannot continue to do what we have always done and expect to have any different results. Seriously, lets take a step back, look outside the box and be willing to become radicals for Christ.  Look at who we all profess to be our Risen Savior.  A  poor carpenter from the backwater of Galilee, a Nazarene,  What good ever came out of Nazareth anyway.  A man who broke the Laws of Moses, who ate and cavorted with the unclean.  He spoke to women and treated them as equals, he choose his closest followers from the lowest  ranks of society. He kept company with most undesirables and had the audacity to challenge the status quo.  </p>
<p>How many of us think Jesus would have made it through the ordination process as it is now defined?  Who would want to be the one to tell Him he is not qualified?  Come to think of it would any of us stood and told the powers that be they had made a mistake?  Would any of us have signed a petition for ordination for the man just described?  Would we have felt compelled to lay our hands on Him and recognize Him?  Would we do it today if we had the opportunity?  Would we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by thevinyard</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>thevinyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I guess I would re-state what I said a couple of days ago...

However we consider, Asbury and Cokesbury to be radical -    Wesley [who ordained for pragmatic reasons- agreed- and it was this also which finally separated the Methodist movement for the CoE] would always counter that the Methodist movement had the marks of the &#039;one holy catholic apostolic church&#039; in that it did ordain by laying on of hands and this was apostolic- the movement adhered to right scripture, prayer, Baptism and the Eucharist. .. Oh, theres so much more to this...Wesley was reracing to a &#039;stagneted religion - or- denomination. Is this what your actually up against? 

Every revival will surely be accountable to its past in the end and if succesful will became an instution 

I guess this is all placed in the framework of &#039;experience&#039; 

OOOOHHHHHHHHHH - I need to think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I would re-state what I said a couple of days ago&#8230;</p>
<p>However we consider, Asbury and Cokesbury to be radical &#8211;    Wesley [who ordained for pragmatic reasons- agreed- and it was this also which finally separated the Methodist movement for the CoE] would always counter that the Methodist movement had the marks of the &#8216;one holy catholic apostolic church&#8217; in that it did ordain by laying on of hands and this was apostolic- the movement adhered to right scripture, prayer, Baptism and the Eucharist. .. Oh, theres so much more to this&#8230;Wesley was reracing to a &#8217;stagneted religion &#8211; or- denomination. Is this what your actually up against? </p>
<p>Every revival will surely be accountable to its past in the end and if succesful will became an instution </p>
<p>I guess this is all placed in the framework of &#8216;experience&#8217; </p>
<p>OOOOHHHHHHHHHH &#8211; I need to think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ordination by Petition? by s b gaddie</title>
		<link>http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ordination-by-petition/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>s b gaddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methomergentlab.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I apologize for severe spelling errors on previous reply, it is very early in the morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for severe spelling errors on previous reply, it is very early in the morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
